eggshell skull rule
This information should not be taken as the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. An oft-cited example of a plaintiff whose injuries are covered by the eggshell plaintiff or Thin Skull Rule is one who suffers from hemophilia. The contentprovided here isfor informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject. This is because an intervening event that aggravates an existing injury or causes a new injury complicates the connection. Then, the burden of proof falls to the victim. Comal County remains one of the fastest growing in the country, and new developments continue to be built throughout the region. For example, in Richman, deputy sheriffs were sued for violating the federal constitutional rights of the plaintiffs son who died resisting arrest. While being treated for his injuries, his injuries were exacerbated by the negligent medical treatment of the appellant, Mahony. The eggshell rule (also thin skull rule, papier-mch-plaintiff rule, or talem qualem rule)[1] is a well-established legal doctrine in common law, used in some tort law systems,[2] with a similar doctrine applicable to criminal law. This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. The thin skull rule, also known as the "egg- shell rule", is a well-established principle in both English tort and criminal law. Read more While a normal person might only experience headaches and some bruising, the impact fractures your delicate skull. Looking for a flexible role? The eggshell skull rule, or thin skull rule, is a common-law doctrine that says that a tortfeasor cannot complain if the accident victims' physical injuries are more serious than they otherwise would have been because the victim has a pre-existing vulnerability like a thin skull. An injured person is entitled to recover full compensation for all damages that proximately result from a defendants tortious act, even if some or all of the injuries might not have occurred but for the plaintiffs preexisting physical condition, disease, or susceptibility to injury. 2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), [a]s a result of what the jury found was the negligent application of a permanent wave by the [defendants] employeenotwithstanding that Ms. Stein informed the beautician that she was adversely susceptible to the chemical solution requiredMs. Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! Wis. 2009)], In calculating damages in an eggshell skull case the trier of fact must make an adjustment for the possibility that the preexisting condition would have resulted in harm to the plaintiff even if there had been no tort. ;26?AB827",o="";for(var j=0,l=mi.length;j Dawsonville, Ga To Atlanta Airport,
Spring Green Wauconda,
Maurice 'the Mad', 4th Viscount Of Fermoy Roche,
Articles E